MMAForum UFCForum

Go Back   Fight Forum > Mixed Martial Arts > UFC

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-20-2007, 08:22 AM   #1
Banned
 
Nimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,641
Default An Open Letter to Dana White

An Open Letter to Dana White

posted on sherdog today, not sure what to make of it.
Nimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 09:14 AM   #2
Champion
 
StratTone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,204
Default

Well I think it isn't Dana's responsibility to change things. Fighters are responsible for there own actions. We as watchers (if we dissagree) need to boycott fighters for there actions. Media (unfortunaly) runs things here in the US. By that I mean, if the draw is still there for a fighter he will fight or play or whatever. We need to boycott what we don't believe it. Be voicefull about what we don't like and changes will be made. UFC is the product and we are the producer. I we don't like grapes then they will plant oranges. But if we eat the grapes anyway then they will keep making them............

To me Dana is doing all he can do. The fighters as well. They are under extreme pressure (by us) to do well. I can see both sides of the fence so I guess I don't really have an opinion. To me roids don't make that much of a difference in the cage. I like to know who uses and who doesn't but when it is all said in done we know who went into the ring/cage that night and what the "used" so he can take the variables from the fight and dicuss what we think. If a roid guy wins and we dicuss out displeasure with a juiced up winner then we take away his feeling of victory. :-)
StratTone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 09:20 AM   #3
I speak smiley
 
bayouboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,734
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StratTone View Post
Well I think it isn't Dana's responsibility to change things. Fighters are responsible for there own actions. We as watchers (if we dissagree) need to boycott fighters for there actions. Media (unfortunaly) runs things here in the US. By that I mean, if the draw is still there for a fighter he will fight or play or whatever. We need to boycott what we don't believe it. Be voicefull about what we don't like and changes will be made. UFC is the product and we are the producer. I we don't like grapes then they will plant oranges. But if we eat the grapes anyway then they will keep making them............

To me Dana is doing all he can do. The fighters as well. They are under extreme pressure (by us) to do well. I can see both sides of the fence so I guess I don't really have an opinion. To me roids don't make that much of a difference in the cage. I like to know who uses and who doesn't but when it is all said in done we know who went into the ring/cage that night and what the "used" so he can take the variables from the fight and dicuss what we think. If a roid guy wins and we dicuss out displeasure with a juiced up winner then we take away his feeling of victory. :-)
Sorry but I couldn't disagree more. Go ask Bud Selig if he wishes he would have struck at steroids hard a decade ago in major league baseball and he would say yes a thousand times. Since he didn't a decade ago that's why he is now dealing with a major embarrasement in Barry Bonds. Dana has the power to set regulations for his own sport to keep it clean so why not do it? Why not do what you can to avoid future champions testing positive? He can and he should.
bayouboy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 09:27 AM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dublin
Posts: 547
Default

I think it is worse to use steroids as a fighter than it is for say a track and field star. In any sporting avenue it is wrong, but for fighters, particularly boxers where you are inflicting harm on your opponent, using steroids to gain unfair advantage over your opponent is unethical and in my mind should be a criminal offence. You may as well, carry a crow-bar into the ring! Sean Sherk, Bonnar, Roy Jones Jr! All should be banned for life IMO
IrishMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 09:28 AM   #5
Contender
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Maine
Posts: 470
Default

What did he mean when he was talking about Nate Marquardt?
Shoney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 09:49 AM   #6
Champion
 
Saskabush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 2,155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoney View Post
What did he mean when he was talking about Nate Marquardt?
I was wondering the same thing myself.


Dana is not to blame though, the only one to blame is the athletic commission. They have obviously not tested/enforced their rules enough to make fighters fear using steroids. Fighters who use steroids assume that they will get away with it and I bet most of the time they do. Each fighter should be tested on a regular basis to protect the integrity of the sport.
__________________
Saskabush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 10:22 AM   #7
Contender
 
Drexal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 445
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoney View Post
What did he mean when he was talking about Nate Marquardt?
Nate Marquardt had his positive steroid test overturned a few years ago.
__________________


Koscheck: "St. Pierre doesn’t have a big heart or a good chin"

GSP: “I think he hasn’t seen my fight with B.J. Penn.


Drexal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 10:27 AM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 511
Default

I blame both parties and I think drugs test should happen on everyone every time they fight. If they get caught it is a years suspension with no pay, while still under contract so that they couldnt fight for another company.


I dont get the bit about Dan Henderson... is he really clean then? A proper sportsman?
BispingKO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 10:37 AM   #9
Top Ranked
 
Kaledonia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bellshill
Posts: 819
Default

Am dismissing this article from Josh Gross as complete and absolute crap. This was the moron who got slighted when his press creditials got revoked, alledgely for giving out information that was before due release time or whatever, and now he is taking up a current issue and using it to bash Dana White.

Sure White has his problems, but is this drug inquiry one of them? Nope, not at all. Fighters have managers and trainers, its THEIR responsibility, Josh goes into some detail about the UK and Texas not screening for drugs as if White is using this as a get around to avoid any bad press relating to drugs. As if.

I had to read the letter twice, the first time I could only read a huge FU. This clown needs to get a grip imo, instead of offering advice of any kind, its all "whatcha ya gonna do about it", well its non of his freaking buissness how its run at the end of the day and if you dont like it you can watch something else.
__________________
"There is no shame in poverty

He who gives his utmost for his goal is a noble person"


- Choi Baedal
Kaledonia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 11:04 AM   #10
Contender
 
p19101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 451
Default

brilliant letter, couldn't have said it better myself!
__________________
Favourite fighters:

1. Fedor
2. Dan Henderson
3. Forrest Griffin
4. Randy Couture
5. Eddie Alvarez
p19101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 11:05 AM   #11
Machida Title Shot Now
 
earvinarp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,087
Default

You may be right it is not Dana's fault only. But it is unquestionable the mma community and, specially, the UFC have a big problem in their hands. There is something out there that tells the fighters that it is better to use drugs and get caught than the alternative. That clearly suggests that the mma community needs a change of culture. And White can do a lot in that regard.
earvinarp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 11:10 AM   #12
Top Ranked
 
Kaledonia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bellshill
Posts: 819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by earvinarp View Post
You may be right it is not Dana's fault only. But it is unquestionable the mma community and, specially, the UFC have a big problem in their hands. There is something out there that tells the fighters that it is better to use drugs and get caught than the alternative. That clearly suggests that the mma community needs a change of culture. And White can do a lot in that regard.
While you are right in what you have said its impossible for White to make any difference even if he so choose too. MMA is taking off big time with many other promotions, if White starts kicking out every fighter from the UFC with a positive test then he is only going to make his org look like a bunch of ball busters and the fighters will go to other stables and orgs.

Like so many of you are realising now, the "problem" is so widespread that it will probably never go away, and the pressure the fighters are under will always drive them to exceed at any cost. Guys might not go into this for the money at the biggest, but with the trappings of sucess, fame and fortune, an enduring legacy for others to follow, who isnt going to break a few rules to get in on that? A mans honour or integrity? Even those things mean different things from person to person.

Meh, I say brush this entire issue under the carpet and send Leon after those who make big pissy statements about it.
__________________
"There is no shame in poverty

He who gives his utmost for his goal is a noble person"


- Choi Baedal
Kaledonia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 11:20 AM   #13
Champion
 
Heatwaves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bayouboy View Post
Sorry but I couldn't disagree more. Go ask Bud Selig if he wishes he would have struck at steroids hard a decade ago in major league baseball and he would say yes a thousand times. Since he didn't a decade ago that's why he is now dealing with a major embarrasement in Barry Bonds. Dana has the power to set regulations for his own sport to keep it clean so why not do it? Why not do what you can to avoid future champions testing positive? He can and he should.
Of course the difference here is that Sherk, Franca and others actually tested positive for steroids. Bonds, McGuire, Sosa, etc., are suspected users. Given that only people with bags over their heads would think these guys are clean, but wouldn't it be funny if Bonds has actually been clean the whole time?

Anyway, back to your main point. I agree with you that it is Dana's role to help clean up the sport. In addition to what the NSAC and CSAC dole out, the UFC could institute it's own fines and suspensions. At 1 year, the suspensions are pretty stiff already, but they could certainly step up a fine over the $2,500 and keep in in context with a particular fighter's earnings. (i.e. fining Gracie only $2,500 is just silly).
__________________
Heatwaves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 11:23 AM   #14
Top Ranked
 
Ztous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 790
Default

The only thing I want from Dana is the banning of every fighter caught taking steroids.
Ztous is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 12:07 PM   #15
Champion
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ztous View Post
The only thing I want from Dana is the banning of every fighter caught taking steroids.
One guy stated how if they are too strict than the fighters would choose to go to other orgs. so imo I say you have a 1, 2, or 3 strike system which show other orgs. that fighters were given every chance to clean up but still failed. It also makes the fighters useless to any org. b/c they cannot be trusted. Now having said that, I agree w/ you 100%; I have zero tolerance for steroid use and I would just assume ban them for life but for political reasons I think some kind of 2nd chance system would be a better move.
FightFan76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 12:08 PM   #16
Contender
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Maine
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drexal View Post
Nate Marquardt had his positive steroid test overturned a few years ago.

Thanks. I didn't know that.
Shoney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 12:15 PM   #17
Contender
 
p19101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FightFan76 View Post
One guy stated how if they are too strict than the fighters would choose to go to other orgs. so imo I say you have a 1, 2, or 3 strike system which show other orgs. that fighters were given every chance to clean up but still failed. It also makes the fighters useless to any org. b/c they cannot be trusted. Now having said that, I agree w/ you 100%; I have zero tolerance for steroid use and I would just assume ban them for life but for political reasons I think some kind of 2nd chance system would be a better move.
3 chances are too many! First time caught = 1 year ban, 2nd time caught = lifetime ban, that's my opinion.

Also I think UFC needs to test their fighters when events are held in places where there is no established testing. I also belive there is a need for random testing in between fights. With todays banned substances it's way too easy to use and be clean once it's time to be tested. Random testing is needed!
__________________
Favourite fighters:

1. Fedor
2. Dan Henderson
3. Forrest Griffin
4. Randy Couture
5. Eddie Alvarez
p19101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 12:52 PM   #18
Contender
 
Cas2910's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: E Milton, MA
Posts: 440
Default

instead of testing everyone that has an upcoming fight, why dont they test everyone that they have under contract so they dont have time to use them and flush them out of there system. When players know when they are being tested it is easy to use them and get away with it if you know what your doing.
Cas2910 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 12:57 PM   #19
Dallas Cowboys
 
Harms's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,488
Default

Dana said Noah and Marlon will never be in the UFC for getting into a street fight on TUF cause he said it makes his sport look bad. I can't think of worse publicity than roided up fighters and yet he says it isn't his responsibility. Mandatory, random drug tests for all fighters under contract would really make a difference.
__________________
Harms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 01:43 PM   #20
Contender
 
p19101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cas2910 View Post
instead of testing everyone that has an upcoming fight, why dont they test everyone that they have under contract so they dont have time to use them and flush them out of there system. When players know when they are being tested it is easy to use them and get away with it if you know what your doing.
Exactly, they need to test fighters in between fights as well, unannounced random tests.
__________________
Favourite fighters:

1. Fedor
2. Dan Henderson
3. Forrest Griffin
4. Randy Couture
5. Eddie Alvarez
p19101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Dana White interview I heart LNP UFC 2 06-07-2007 05:32 PM
Tito sound clip from radio on Dana White GeorgeXVX UFC 0 04-18-2007 04:43 PM
Tito Ortiz Talks Dana White The-Iceman-Chuck-Liddell UFC 28 04-18-2007 02:06 PM
Nuggets From Dana White Heatwaves UFC 35 02-28-2007 06:08 AM
Dana White Defends UFC Pay Structure subgenius UFC 19 10-10-2006 01:17 AM


UFC Official Site
EliteXC Official Site
King of the Cage
Play Free Games
Live Arcade
News Chat Forum



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.