Originally Posted by StratTone

Ok, this is all wrong to me. Dana did put the UFC where it is. The fighters have always fought because they liked to fight and not for the money but they want to get all the rewards of the money because there the "talent" but when the UFC had nothing there was Dana and the Fertetties. I think for an over the hill fighter like Ken he should be glad for all the pay days he got with such a horrible losing streak. I don't see how americans think like this sometimes. I do understand that a fighter should be paid well but damn if you ask me Ken was losing evertime he fought and his paychecks kept getting higher. What in the world does he have to complain about. Even if you go my Ken's own words....."its about the talent" Well Ken you didn't have the talent so you were let go. It isn't always about putting people in the seats. This isn't a show it is a compitition and when you start to lose 7 in a row or however what are they suppose to do I think they kept Ken around for a long time and did him a favor. Part of running a huge company like the UFC is making huge decisions and sometimes you have to hurt feelings to run the buisness. Am I way off here??