Quote:
Originally Posted by Gygax
Its my contention that without being pharmaceutically enhanced, the Kerr you are promoting as a beast would have been a different fighter. A fighter who would have had a much tougher time defeating Fedor without the help of steroids.
|
But he was on roids, ant that is the Kerr I am referring to because the "Old Kerr" was a druggie, but he was a Tough SOB druggie.
Without naming names or pointing fingers, there were lots of guys in Pride who also took performance enhancing drugs as well, yet we still talk about how great they are and we judge them by the fights that we have seen, which were enhanced by drugs. We don't have any "drug free" Kerr fights to speak of from that era, so your point is moot.
Maybe you should start another thread saying, "If Mark Kerr didn't do drugs would he have been so dominant??" Because that is what you are arguing, Kerrs drug use has nothing to do with this thread.