Originally Posted by Harms

Are you really saying that GSP shouldn't defend his belt against people he is better than in theory because he might lose and an "average" fighter might be champ? Perhaps GSP just shouldn't defend his belt after Fitch and the UFC could just make him the permanant belt holder forever since he would be better than everyone else on paper.

GSP doesn't deserve the unbeatable crown like Silva. Ge Master has a good point. What exactly has GSP proven? On paper, he is heads and tails above almost every fighter in the division. Then in his first title defense he loses to Serra whom almost everyone thought stood no chance. He needs probably 4 or 5 defenses before people should be talking about a fight with Silva. He has proven zero as a champion unlike Silva.

Fitch, Alves, Diego, and Davis are a few I wouldn't mind seeing fight GSP. You may say he would walk over them, but yet again he was supposed to walk over Serra the first time.