Quote:
Originally Posted by OneBigThrow
it depends on whether they see being on bottom is an advantageous position or one of detriment and that really depends on the fighter
and to be honest...i wouldnt feel comfortable with judges considering a fighters past styles and experiences because that theoretically takes away from the objectivity of deciding a contest...in theory
alot of times it is hard to tell whether a guy puts himself on his back on purpose or just screwed up and made the best of the situation u know
|
I meant more in the sense, that a BJJ guy's takedown is more conservative single leg type to try and achieve top position. More of a single leg trip in other words to get to a position where they can transition into a position of submission.
A wrestler u sually goes double leg or body lock takedown and tends to be more spectacular because of the strength and explosion needed, then of course the inevitable slam.
I wonder if a judge would score the two differently