 |  |
 |
|
02-19-2006, 10:58 PM
|
#1
|
|
FF Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 4,167
|
Nick Diaz vs. Sean Sherk
Looks like diaz is going to go against sherk in UFC 59 now. It also looks like its going to be diaz's 3rd loss in a row in the ufc...wonder what they will do with him after that?
I just finished watching a sherk fight and a highligh video since i posted the above, and i give diaz next to no chance to beating sherk if sherk comes in fighting condition and ready for this fight. i just dont see anyway for him to lose to diaz after seeing diaz's last two fights.....
|
|
|
02-19-2006, 11:16 PM
|
#2
|
|
Champion
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,102
|
I really enjoy watching Diaz fight. I hope he wins this fight so I can see more of it.
|
|
|
02-20-2006, 01:03 AM
|
#3
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,528
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jras0001
Looks like diaz is going to go against sherk in UFC 59 now. It also looks like its going to be diaz's 3rd loss in a row in the ufc...wonder what they will do with him after that?
I just finished watching a sherk fight and a highligh video since i posted the above, and i give diaz next to no chance to beating sherk if sherk comes in fighting condition and ready for this fight. i just dont see anyway for him to lose to diaz after seeing diaz's last two fights.....
|
Nick Diaz...are you talking about that scrub they fed to Diego Sanchez?!
Pffft lets not insult Sean Sherk please. At least put him up against a decent opponent...yessh.
|
|
|
02-20-2006, 01:53 AM
|
#4
|
|
Shooto Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hamilton, MT
Posts: 2,443
|
God I hope you're joking . . .
__________________
|
|
|
02-20-2006, 03:26 AM
|
#5
|
|
FF Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 4,167
|
nope, no joke...its in the rumor section of mmaweekly.com. ill put the link for you guys to see for yourself.....its the bottom fight listed for rumored UFC 59fights. looks like its going to be an undercard fight. if the otehrs end soon enough, looks like we may get to see it.
http://www.mmaweekly.com/absolutenm/...1292&zoneid=14
|
|
|
02-20-2006, 07:25 AM
|
#6
|
|
This space 4 Rent
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pompton Plains,NJ
Posts: 1,350
|
Glad to see Tanner is still in the UFC that will be a good match! I think Sherk will beat Diaz as well, but Diaz REALLY needs to win this fight!
__________________
Kalib "The Vacuum Cleaner" Starnes
Cost 47 Fight Forum betters 1.6 Million points at UFC 83!
2008 March Madness Contest--2nd place
|
|
|
02-20-2006, 10:02 AM
|
#7
|
|
I gave up fighting
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: near a waterfall
Posts: 7,494
|
Diaz is really going to need to win this fight. he is easily in one of the more stacked divisions and he is losing ground fast to other fighters. should Diaz lose he does have one thing going for him, he is a tough fighter who is going to benefit from the UFC putting on so many events, both PPV and television. i think he will be the guy who gets to be the first fight for alot of UFC newbs.
|
|
|
02-20-2006, 10:43 AM
|
#8
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: manchester CT
Posts: 4,798
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jras0001
Looks like diaz is going to go against sherk in UFC 59 now. It also looks like its going to be diaz's 3rd loss in a row in the ufc...wonder what they will do with him after that?
I just finished watching a sherk fight and a highligh video since i posted the above, and i give diaz next to no chance to beating sherk if sherk comes in fighting condition and ready for this fight. i just dont see anyway for him to lose to diaz after seeing diaz's last two fights.....
|
hahaha... ugh. ummm i dunno man, all of sherks wins are over no names, his last fight he absolutely got creamed.... he is definently going to be a pretty big underdog in this fight....
|
|
|
02-20-2006, 12:51 PM
|
#9
|
|
Shooto Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hamilton, MT
Posts: 2,443
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jras0001
nope, no joke...its in the rumor section of mmaweekly.com. ill put the link for you guys to see for yourself.....its the bottom fight listed for rumored UFC 59fights. looks like its going to be an undercard fight. if the otehrs end soon enough, looks like we may get to see it.
http://www.mmaweekly.com/absolutenm/...1292&zoneid=14
|
Nah, I was talking to the guy who called Diaz a bum. I'm excited to see this fight live. I'll cheer for Nick.
__________________
|
|
|
02-20-2006, 02:32 PM
|
#10
|
|
FF Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 4,167
|
ya, i for one am really looking forward to this fight...i think it has the chance to be a pretty good fight
|
|
|
02-20-2006, 05:04 PM
|
#11
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,528
|
It won't be long before getting a victory over Nick Diaz means nothing. There is only so many times they can feed that scrub to guys like Diego to make them look better.
Lets not waste sherk's time please. Give him a formidable opponent!
Last edited by DrumzCT; 02-20-2006 at 10:55 PM.
|
|
|
02-20-2006, 06:40 PM
|
#12
|
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 275
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jras0001
Looks like diaz is going to go against sherk in UFC 59 now. It also looks like its going to be diaz's 3rd loss in a row in the ufc...wonder what they will do with him after that?
I just finished watching a sherk fight and a highligh video since i posted the above, and i give diaz next to no chance to beating sherk if sherk comes in fighting condition and ready for this fight. i just dont see anyway for him to lose to diaz after seeing diaz's last two fights.....
|
hey i dont know ,i like nick by submission because shaw didnt look that hot agaist GSP even thou he is at the top of the food chart
|
|
|
02-20-2006, 10:46 PM
|
#13
|
|
Contender
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Newmarket, On
Posts: 451
|
If Diaz looses this one he should go back to the minor leagues and improve his game. The guy has potential, but has not finnished a fight in a long time.
|
|
|
02-20-2006, 10:47 PM
|
#14
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: manchester CT
Posts: 4,798
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Grave
It won't be long before getting a victory over Nick Diaz means nothing. There is only so many times they can feed that scrub to guys like Diego to make them look better.
Lets not waste sherk's time please. Give him a formidable opponent for christs sake!
|
i cant tell if your joking or not, you are aware sherk is the underdog for this fight??
|
|
|
02-20-2006, 11:50 PM
|
#15
|
|
Top Prospect
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 92
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Grave
It won't be long before getting a victory over Nick Diaz means nothing. There is only so many times they can feed that scrub to guys like Diego to make them look better.
Lets not waste sherk's time please. Give him a formidable opponent!
|
Some of you aren't shy about letting your hatred/dislike for a fighter out are you guys? I try and be as fair and unbiased as I can when I'm trying to criticize fighters. First of all Nick Diaz is no scrub. Go ask Robbie Lawler. Second, I believe that Sean Sherk has been dominated in his last two losses (Hughes and GSP). Now I know those are 2 out of the top 3 WW (BJ and GSP will decide #2), but there still bad losses. I think that it is a pick'em fight. Diaz does need to prove something here, but lets all be realistic and not give the guy his do just because you may hate how cocky he is or that you love another fighter so much (AHEM *Diego* AHEM)
GO BABALU! :sport-smi
__________________
Don't look back. Something might be gaining on you.
-Satchel Paige
|
|
|
02-21-2006, 12:29 AM
|
#16
|
|
Artes Marciales Mezclados
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bobstown, USA
Posts: 8,512
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Iceman
If Diaz looses this one he should go back to the minor leagues and improve his game. The guy has potential, but has not finnished a fight in a long time.
|
I agree. Nick Diaz has lost to Sanchez and Riggs. One is an up-and-coming young fighter. The other is a 300 pound man in the body of a 170-200 pound man, LOL. J/K I do like the Diesel, but I think that the number 185 or 205 should come up in his future fights. Seriously, Riggs fought well against Diaz, but I think that Nick Diaz ought to have fought better and won that fight. The fight with Sanchez was closer. However, I still think that Sanchez would beat Diaz in any Sanchez-Diaz 2 rematch.
|
|
|
02-21-2006, 02:35 PM
|
#17
|
|
Top Ranked
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 978
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jras0001
I just finished watching a sherk fight and a highligh video since i posted the above, and i give diaz next to no chance to beating sherk if sherk comes in fighting condition and ready for this fight. i just dont see anyway for him to lose to diaz after seeing diaz's last two fights.....
|
You mean two fights that he arguably won? Both are controversial decisions. I think Pride rules where more emphasis is put on the person who is trying to finish the fight, Diaz would've won both. UFC, control seems to be the main thing they look for, and that's why he lost. However, it's not like he was outmatched in either fight.
|
|
|
02-21-2006, 03:12 PM
|
#18
|
|
Professional
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mepersoner
You mean two fights that he arguably won? Both are controversial decisions. I think Pride rules where more emphasis is put on the person who is trying to finish the fight, Diaz would've won both.
|
No offense, but you could make that argument to each and every fight in the UFC. If you go by Pride rules, then Wes Sims in his first fight with Mir probably would've stomped the sh*t out of him when he had him against the cage.
But I do agree that his last two fights are debatable, especially the Riggs decision.
|
|
|
02-21-2006, 03:48 PM
|
#19
|
|
FF Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 4,167
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mepersoner
You mean two fights that he arguably won? Both are controversial decisions. I think Pride rules where more emphasis is put on the person who is trying to finish the fight, Diaz would've won both. UFC, control seems to be the main thing they look for, and that's why he lost. However, it's not like he was outmatched in either fight.
|
the diaz / sanchez fight wasnt close...as much as i dislike diego, he dominated nick and kept him on the ground dodging punches and getting pounded. he couldnt better his position or go on the offensive. he clearly lost that fight.
the diaz / riggs fight was a lot closer, but riggs clearly won that fight. diaz won the first round no doubt, but thats it. the majority of the fighting in the second and third round was stand up and riggs clearly won the standup of the fight. diaz didnt take him down in the later part of the fight and didnt come close to hurting riggs again after the first round. riggs won that fight 2 rounds to 1 easily.
you can say "if he had been fighting there, or if he had been fightng here...." he would have won, but he wasnt, he was fighting in the UFC and he was beaten in both matches hands down.
|
|
|
02-21-2006, 04:19 PM
|
#20
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: manchester CT
Posts: 4,798
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jras0001
the diaz / sanchez fight wasnt close...as much as i dislike diego, he dominated nick and kept him on the ground dodging punches and getting pounded. he couldnt better his position or go on the offensive. he clearly lost that fight.
the diaz / riggs fight was a lot closer, but riggs clearly won that fight. diaz won the first round no doubt, but thats it. the majority of the fighting in the second and third round was stand up and riggs clearly won the standup of the fight. diaz didnt take him down in the later part of the fight and didnt come close to hurting riggs again after the first round. riggs won that fight 2 rounds to 1 easily.
you can say "if he had been fighting there, or if he had been fightng here...." he would have won, but he wasnt, he was fighting in the UFC and he was beaten in both matches hands down.
|
is everything hands down????
sherk beating diaz hands down, riggs beating diaz hands down, i dunno about either
one judge had the match 30 to 27 clearly showing that their was bias against diaz. it was a very very close fight, nothing wrong with saying that... no one clearly had to win, i thought it was a draw if anything...
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 AM.
|