
Originally Posted by
EC_Raider_07
MMA VS. BOXING: WHICH IS BETTER AND WHY??
To me, the whole boxing vs. MMA debate is just as stale as UFC vs. Pride. I'm a fan of combat sports. I don't care what it is. MMA, boxing, college wrestling, karate; I don't care. In my opinion, just saying "my sport is better than yours" is closed minded and ignorant.
Both boxing an MMA are exciting. The reason there's so much debate, is because people are trying to compare them as similar sports. They are not. They're 2 different sports. Each is as exciting as the next, if you give it a chance.
Boxing is exciting to me because of it's history. I love seeing old fights, learning about their legacy's, and seeing the impact different fighters had on the sport. Seeing as MMA is so new, you don't get this. Boxing is a very exciting sport if you can watch it for what it is. A lot of people use the excuse that "boxing is not like a real street fight!" I'm sorry to tell you, neither is MMA. MMA is a sport, not a street brawl. Most MMA fans are tough guys expecting to see a blood bath every time they turn the T.V. on. These are the people that boo fights when they go to the ground, ect. Boxing is a chess match. Although KO's are nice and very common, the point of boxing is to score points with your combinations and footwork. Boxing is a great sport, but not a lot of people give it a chance.
MMA is also a great sport. To me, MMA is ranked above even football and baseball. MMA is exciting because there's so many different elements involved. Most predictions are pretty random, because it's almost impossible to predict how a fight will end. It could end by submission, (T)KO, GnP, corner stoppage, or decision. There are, however, 2 problems I have with MMA. The first is impatient American crowns (I say this as a patriotic American.) It's annoying to hear drunk A-holes booing fighters because they are ignorant as to what's going on. Sorry to tell you people, but MMA isn't street fighting. I'll go out and say it; Stephen Bonnar vs. Forrest Griffin was a terrible technical fight. If either of these guys would have fought like that against a top tier opponent, they would have been destroyed. My second problem with MMA is the lack of respect for decision wins. When people try and debate wins, they always seem to bring up "He only beat so-and-so by decision!" Sorry to tell you boys, but a win is a win. Those are really my only problems with MMA. And as you can see, those problems are caused by so called "fight fans", rather then the sport itself.
So, in closing. I like both sports. If you bring the "boxing owns MMA" or vice versa argument with out taking the time to learn about both, you're ignorant. Sorry about the rant, but I'm done.
What was the topic again...?