 |  |
04-21-2008, 07:12 AM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
FF Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,775
Points: 476
Bank: 86,770
Total Points: 87,246
Donate
|
Well the fight went exactly how I expected it to, but it was still pretty exciting. Mike looked a lot better and a hell of a lot quicker at 185lbs imo, he also had that pent up aggression before the fight that he hasnt seemed to have since the Sinosic fight.
Was good to see the Canadians give him a good reception too, I guess its just the Americans who felt bad about the Hamill decision! 
|
|
|
04-21-2008, 09:13 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Top Ranked
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Somewhere in NY
Posts: 902
Points: 20
Bank: 160,864
Total Points: 160,884
Donate
|
Bisping looked good and put on a pretty good show. He deserves the win. 
|
|
|
04-22-2008, 02:34 AM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
Top Ranked
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 730
Points: 1,284
Bank: 0
Total Points: 1,284
Donate
|
i really dont like mccarthy. he talks smack about bisping, and says that his jiu jitsu is the best in the division. is he crazy? 185 is stacked with bjj experts - silva, lutter, almeida, marquardt, lister, franklin etc etc are all better than him. it was pretty bizarre how as soon as the distance closed mccarthy just covered up while bisping hit him. then he went on with those antics which is appauling. he did get a nice takedown though and was fairly close to getting the armbar, but bisping was in a good position to shift his hips round, get his knee in mccarthys face and pull his elbow out. when mccarthy started covering up again i said to everyone he's gonna get his forearm broken if he keeps doing that. and sure enough he did.
|
|
|
04-23-2008, 04:34 AM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
Professional
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 153
Points: 49
Bank: 2,157
Total Points: 2,206
Donate
|
I thought Bisping looked like crap at 205, and was actually a bit of a hater. But at 185, he looks damn good. I don't know if he's a title contender or anything, but I like this version of Bisping much, much more than the 205 lb version!
|
|
|
04-23-2008, 04:43 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
Points: 138
Bank: 0
Total Points: 138
Donate
|
Quote:
|
I agree McCarthy was a "sacrificial lamb." That said, Bisping looks like a legit MW, with speed and good overall game. He should have fought Franklin last night, instead of both Rich and himself facing lesser opponents.
|
I disagree, both for the confedince, and the marketing, it was much better to let both off them get a solid win like they did. It wouldn't be smart for one to eliminate the other at this points, as they both book solid fights, and they both bring it in to the octagon.
I always liked Bisping, but he looked great. I always tought he looked a bit sloppy. And i kinda hated him for steeling that win against Hamill. But he looked really solid. So props to Bisping.
|
|
|
04-23-2008, 01:12 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
Champion
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Inside my skin
Posts: 1,370
Points: 11
Bank: 125,689
Total Points: 125,700
Donate
|
Meh..... McCarthy was terrible..... Hadn't fought in 18 months....
Let's see how Bisping does against Leben.
__________________
Oi've got me emotions, ya know, but oi'm still a fighta. Ross Pointon
|
|
|
04-23-2008, 02:50 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Businessless Person
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 6,233
Points: 2,830
Bank: 195,294
Total Points: 198,124
Donate
|
I was extremely impressed with Bisping at 185. Not so much because he destroyed McCarthy but because he just looked like he fit in the division. He did'nt come in all dehydrated and weak. He does need to sharpen up his striking a bit but his sloppiness might have had more to do with McCarthy doing nothing in response. I can see him doing well at 185.
|
|
|
04-23-2008, 09:35 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
Top Ranked
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 730
Points: 1,284
Bank: 0
Total Points: 1,284
Donate
|
i found it pretty interesting that he said he didnt even need to cut any weight to fight at 185
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
Points Per Thread View: 1
Points Per Thread: 15
Points Per Reply: 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 AM.
|