Announcement at UFC 70... TUF 6 coaches are...

**Gooner** · 04-21-2007 03:15 PM

Matt Hughes and Matt Serra.
So the underdog and the penis are going head-to-head.
It'll be like a good cop and a bad cop.

Serra:
"Matt Hughes is a dick. He is a talented dick."
You don't say.

**Pitbull** · 04-21-2007 03:21 PM

Serra must feel like he's on top of the world right now. Good for him.

**xVERITASx** · 04-21-2007 03:24 PM

.....I really do not like this at all. Those would be that last two. I think Hughes is just not right for TV and Serra starts to get on alot of peoples nerves. I can also just see GSP coming in as a guest trainer now to.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

**Corey** · 04-21-2007 03:33 PM

I dont like the coach selections, just really dont make much sense to me. Koschek and Sanchez would have been better imo.

**yaiir** · 04-21-2007 07:14 PM

Originally Posted by Corey

I dont like the coach selections, just really dont make much sense to me. Koschek and Sanchez would have been better imo.

Why does there always have to be beef between the coaches?

**Corey** · 04-21-2007 07:29 PM

Originally Posted by yaiir

Why does there always have to be beef between the coaches?

Its just more entertaining. FYI theres a beef between hughes and serra too.

**Jras0001** · 04-21-2007 07:57 PM

Im a 'tard....just skip this post.

**Gooner** · 04-21-2007 08:08 PM

Originally Posted by Corey

Koschek and Sanchez would have been better imo.

How about Joe and Dan Lauzon?
C'mon, Koscheck is hardly coach material just yet. Most of the contestants would have more experience than him.

Originally Posted by Jras0001

Ongoing thread about this in the TUF forums already:

TUF 6 Coaches.

What do you mean "already"?

It was posted after this one. By you.

**Jras0001** · 04-21-2007 08:15 PM

Originally Posted by Gooner

How about Joe and Dan Lauzon?
C'mon, Koscheck is hardly coach material just yet. Most of the contestants would have more experience than him.

What do you mean "already"?

It was posted after this one. By you.

Yes, it was posted by me but I didnt see you had already started one about the same thing or would have just psoted in this one. I looked all over when I made that to make sure I wasnt double posting and have no clue how I missed your post. I didnt see it untill a few minutes ago actually....sorry.

**rdowney19** · 04-21-2007 08:45 PM

Hughes already coached. i know the coaches have to fight and hughes is up next in line for a title shot, but this doesn't interest me. kos and diego wouldn't be good coaches and gsp was already on tuf as well. i don't have any good suggestions for this.(if you want a beef tuf have dana talk matt laimon into coaching opposite serra with laimon getting a title shot, THAT was beef)

**sitnspin** · 04-21-2007 11:22 PM

The reason I think this is dumb is:

1) Dana and Serra and Hughes have all said in the past couple of weeks that Hughes will almost certainly be Serra's first title defense.

2) Now Dana has said that they'll fight at the end of TUF 6.

3) The end of TUF 6 will be several months from now.

4) Does that mean that Serra won't defend his title until the Fall / Winter? That's ridiculous.

5) If they give GSP a rematch first, and he wins the belt back, won't that take a lot of steam out of the Hughes-Serra match?

6) This doesn't make much sense, and I don't know why I did this post in numerical point form.

**KungFuGrip** · 04-21-2007 11:30 PM

Originally Posted by sitnspin

The reason I think this is dumb is:

1) Dana and Serra and Hughes have all said in the past couple of weeks that Hughes will almost certainly be Serra's first title defense.

2) Now Dana has said that they'll fight at the end of TUF 6.

3) The end of TUF 6 will be several months from now.

4) Does that mean that Serra won't defend his title until the Fall / Winter? That's ridiculous.

5) If they give GSP a rematch first, and he wins the belt back, won't that take a lot of steam out of the Hughes-Serra match?

6) This doesn't make much sense, and I don't know why I did this post in numerical point form.

Agreed. End of another season of tuf for a WW title.............no way.

**subgenius** · 04-21-2007 11:31 PM

Originally Posted by sitnspin

The reason I think this is dumb is:

1) Dana and Serra and Hughes have all said in the past couple of weeks that Hughes will almost certainly be Serra's first title defense.

2) Now Dana has said that they'll fight at the end of TUF 6.

3) The end of TUF 6 will be several months from now.

4) Does that mean that Serra won't defend his title until the Fall / Winter? That's ridiculous.

5) If they give GSP a rematch first, and he wins the belt back, won't that take a lot of steam out of the Hughes-Serra match?

6) This doesn't make much sense, and I don't know why I did this post in numerical point form.

Unless they do a special summer TUF season, then that means that Serra will not defend his title until October or November or maybe even December. The TUF-4 Finale was on November 11, 2006. The season was August 17th to November 11th. So, if they have the Serra-Hughes match at the Finale for TUF-6, then we will have to wait until November. If they wait until after the Finale, then it will be December.

Either way it sucks. Also, it sucks that Serra and Hughes are coaches. Mostly Hughes, because he has already coached. And, because I hate the way they have the coach versus coach thing going on in most of the seasons. I want it to be about the fighters, not the coaches, on that show.

**sitnspin** · 04-21-2007 11:34 PM

And Hughes was also a lame coach who put up guys from his team that he wanted to get rid of -- hardly the way a coach is supposed to think when putting matches together.

**T-Bone** · 04-21-2007 11:35 PM

Originally Posted by Gooner

Matt Hughes and Matt Serra.
So the underdog and the penis are going head-to-head.
It'll be like a good cop and a bad cop.

Serra:
"Matt Hughes is a dick. He is a talented dick."
You don't say.

Serra's great. Big Apple v. Farm Country.

I do think they'll be doing the TUF soon. Having Serra's first title defense at year end or close to it wouldn't be a wise move.

Tito v. Ken seemed like it would be about the coaches but that one wasn't just about those two at all.

**Super Warrior** · 04-21-2007 11:35 PM

Originally Posted by sitnspin

6) This doesn't make much sense, and I don't know why I did this post in numerical point form.

Damn right, whatever happened to bullet points?!

**milkme** · 04-21-2007 11:38 PM

Great idea, good picks for coaches and I can't wait to see it. One thing; doesn't this delay the fight between serra and hughes tremendously?

**sitnspin** · 04-21-2007 11:51 PM

Originally Posted by milkme

Great idea, good picks for coaches and I can't wait to see it. One thing; doesn't this delay the fight between serra and hughes tremendously?

Did you read the thread before posting that? We're already discussing whether or not it delays the Serra and Hughes fight.

**milkme** · 04-21-2007 11:57 PM

Originally Posted by sitnspin

We're already discussing whether or not it delays the Serra and Hughes fight.

Well if that's the case then this sucks. I can imagine GSP thinking how bad it would be for him to have to wait so long for a chance to get his belt back.

**riversideblues** · 04-22-2007 01:09 AM

reason 6 to not watch tuf!

:\

Thread: Announcement at UFC 70... TUF 6 coaches are...

LinkBack

Thread Tools

Announcement at UFC 70... TUF 6 coaches are...

Similar Threads

UFC Conference Call Notes

Ortiz-Rashad moved to UFC 72.

The UFC & ESPN

UFC 67 Salaries

Posting Permissions