Bas Rutten - Fight Forum - MMA - UFC - Boxing - K1

Crazy · 09-09-2007, 10:02 AM

After seeing UFC 75 it is obvious to me what we need in UFC.
We need Bas Rutten. Somone telling the trouth about how he feels the match went.
Somone talking straight out. Last night Rogan failed to do that.
He have done it before like when Tito-Griffin meet. Disapointing to me to see that he apparently was told not to comment the refs desiccion anmore.

It was just sad, when you feel something is unfair it is nice to hear at least the one making comments to mention it.
I love Bas cus I belive you can`t tell him not to tell if something is unjustice or not.

Anyone knows what Bas is doing these days?

Kurtis636 · 09-09-2007, 11:06 AM

Maybe Joe thought Bisping won. I did.

Crazy · 09-09-2007, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kurtis636

Maybe Joe thought Bisping won. I did.

So you mean they though that after saing at the end of 2 round:

Matt is outstriking him and winning the battle?

Crazy · 09-09-2007, 11:09 AM

This is more about me missing Bas then hating Rogan though. Rogan is cool to lissen to, but I like it more when he is hounest.

Kurtis636 · 09-09-2007, 11:14 AM

I love Bas Rutten, he always added something to the fight when he was commentating.

earvinarp · 09-09-2007, 11:14 AM

There was certainly something fishy about the blunt way in which a usually outspoken Rogan held back so much after the fight. Definitely smells likes forces behind the stage were in action.

That said, please do not compare this to the Tito-Griffin decison. Tito gave Forrest the beating of his life in that first round and that alone granted him a draw. How many times do we need to discuss this? On the other hand, Hamill gave Bisping the beating of his life in the first round and was never behind in the remaining two. They are extremely different cases.

With all due respect, if you want to make a solid case on Hamill-Bisping you need to leave Tito-Griffin out of the discussion.

Crazy · 09-09-2007, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by earvinarp

There was certainly something fishy about the blunt way in which a usually outspoken Rogan held back so much after the fight. Definitely smells likes forces behind the stage were in action.

That said, please do not compare this to the Tito-Griffin decison. Tito gave Forrest the beating of his life in that first round and that alone granted him a draw. How many times do we need to discuss this? On the other hand, Hamill gave Bisping the beating of his life in the first round and was never behind in the remaining two. They are extremely different cases.

With all due respect, if you want to make a solid case on Hamill-Bisping you need to leave Tito-Griffin out of the discussion.

Icompared it cus at that fight Joe screemed out that the ref scooring it 30-27 should have been shoot. He should have had same kind of comments yesterday I think.

earvinarp · 09-09-2007, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crazy

Icompared it cus at that fight Joe screemed out that the ref scooring it 30-27 should have been shoot. He should have had same kind of comments yesterday I think.

Ah, okay, I understand that. So, IMO, Rogan was extremely vocal about 1 ref giving 1 round to the wrong person. I see your point. Last night he was completely silent about 2 refs giving 2 rounds to the wrong person. FISHY

Elder · 09-09-2007, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Hamill gave Bisping the beating of his life in the first round

I agree Hamill won the first round. But if it were up to me, I would can both of these guys because neither one is worthy enough for a future pay per view.

IrishRage · 09-09-2007, 12:05 PM

That fight should of been a draw at the very least but I knew that wasn't going to happen In London , and with Bisping dropping down to 185 a rematch between the two would probably never happen. Rogan makes alot of money calling fights and doing weighs Ins etc etc I don't blame him for sometimes keeping his comments to himself , but at the same time I also wish he would speak his mind no matter what his sidekick Is there to make the obvious remarks and takes the safe broadcast views Rogan should be the guy calling It as he see's It .

Xenofreak · 09-09-2007, 03:09 PM

I like Rogan enough. And seeing Bas on IFL doesn't really want me to get over to ufc any time soon. Maybe to join Rogan, that would be great. But defenitly not to replace Rogan!

StratTone · 09-09-2007, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crazy

After seeing UFC 75 it is obvious to me what we need in UFC.
We need Bas Rutten. Somone telling the trouth about how he feels the match went.
Somone talking straight out. Last night Rogan failed to do that.
He have done it before like when Tito-Griffin meet. Disapointing to me to see that he apparently was told not to comment the refs desiccion anmore.

It was just sad, when you feel something is unfair it is nice to hear at least the one making comments to mention it.
I love Bas cus I belive you can`t tell him not to tell if something is unjustice or not.

Anyone knows what Bas is doing these days?

Rogan is awesome. I don't know what happened last night with that but everyone has there day.

Crazy · 09-09-2007, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StratTone

Rogan is awesome. I don't know what happened last night with that but everyone has there day.

I feel that Rogan was maybe told not to say things against ref anymore.
I surtenly hpe that is not the issue.
I don`t want to replace Rogan either. But I would love to lissen to Bas

Nice team would be Joe/Bas and Randy when he diecides to stop fighting.

fullonshred · 09-09-2007, 05:59 PM

It was a FIX. Pure and simple. And Rogaine was wise enough/weak enough to realize it and keep his mouth shut and toe the company line. Bas Rutten would have personally beaten the s**t out of the two cheats who scored the fight for Bisquick.

BCguy · 09-09-2007, 06:02 PM

Either way .... Bas in the UFC as a commentator would be awesome.

daveyxx · 09-09-2007, 06:09 PM

i would love bas to be a commentator.. what is he doing now by the way?

WarDawg · 09-09-2007, 06:33 PM

I thought the fight could go either way. A coin toss. Where was Hamills dominate wrestling ? He couldn't keep Bisping down . Matt should have known he needed to not leave it in the judges hands. It was a really close fight. I was pulling for Matt. He didn't get the close decision. If he can live with it so should we. IMO WarDawg

non?compos?mentis? · 09-09-2007, 07:38 PM

Bos would be good in the UFC, but not to replace Joe. Bos is with the IFL still, I believe, commentating there. I would really like to see Randy doing it full time when he's done fighting... And maybe Joe did think Bisping won, just have to wait and see.

Crazy · 09-10-2007, 03:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by non?compos?mentis?

Bos would be good in the UFC, but not to replace Joe. Bos is with the IFL still, I believe, commentating there. I would really like to see Randy doing it full time when he's done fighting... And maybe Joe did think Bisping won, just have to wait and see.

he did not, but he did not remember it as that bad as described on the forums. He thought right away that Matt won it but he sayd :I guess I am getting used to bad decissions since they happend all the time.

He want the point system to change and he also tells that he has only once been asked to not say anything and that was when UFC was buying Pride.