MMAForum UFCForum

Go Back   Fight Forum > Mixed Martial Arts > UFC

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2007, 02:31 PM   #1
Administrator
 
Gygax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 3,371
Send a message via AIM to Gygax Send a message via Yahoo to Gygax
Default Sherk suspension reduced to 6 months by CSAC

This is courtesy of Sherdog's Josh Gross...
Quote:
UFC lightweight champion Sean Sherk (Pictures), who was suspended for one year after testing positive for Nandrolone Metabolites following his victory over Hermes Franca (Pictures) at UFC 73 on July 7, had his suspension reduced to six months on Tuesday, reports Sherdog.com editor Josh Gross.

The California State Athletic Commission upheld a fine of $2500. Sherk, 34, will be eligible to return to the Octagon in January.
I'm sure this will leave no one happy. Sherk will be upset that he will be viewed as a cheater, and the anti-Sherk crowd will wonder why he gets his reduced while Hermes Franca's was kept at the full year suspension even though he fully admitted doing steroids.
__________________
Gygax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 02:33 PM   #2
I speak smiley
 
bayoubro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gygax View Post
More to come, but this is what Jordan Breen is reporting on Sherdog Radio.
So would the suspension begin as of his failed test? Last fight? Ruling?
bayoubro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 02:43 PM   #3
Contender
 
mxfuel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ND
Posts: 403
Default

It says that he will return in January. So the suspension must have been considered active a while ago.
mxfuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 02:44 PM   #4
Up and Coming
 
P-Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 106
Default

I wonder if he's going to be stripped of the title. Dana couldn't seem to make up his mind about that one. And also, does this mean the fight between Penn and Stevenson is for the real Lightweight title, or is it still the interim title?
__________________
Randy Couture
Matt Hughes
Mark Coleman
Guy Mezger
Josh Barnett
Fedor Emelianenko
Andrei Arlovski
Nick Diaz
Kazayuki Fujita
Vitor Belfort

"I hear that a lot of people on the Internet are now talking bad about Denis Kang. If they are brave enough to badmouth a professional fighter, why don't these keyboard warriors come out behind their computer and get in the ring themselves to prove how tough they are?" - Gegard Mousasi

Extreme Fighter Magazine
P-Unit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 02:49 PM   #5
Administrator
 
Gygax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 3,371
Send a message via AIM to Gygax Send a message via Yahoo to Gygax
Default

The answers to many of the questions will likely have to wait until Zuffa/Dana White comment on the decision. That may not be until later this week when they have to do pressers for the TUF 6 Finale card. But they may surprise us and comment by the end of tonight.
__________________
Gygax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 02:56 PM   #6
Administrator
 
Gygax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 3,371
Send a message via AIM to Gygax Send a message via Yahoo to Gygax
Default

Highlights from an interview with Sean Sherk on the Steohen Quadros Radio Show today, courtesy of 5 Oz of Pain...
Quote:
Highlights from Sean Sherk on today’s Stephen Quadros Show:

* Sherk said he plans to continue to the fight the suspension. Said he doesn’t care how much money or time it takes.
* He said he’s eligible to come back on January 5th, just two weeks before BJ Penn and Joe Stevenson fight for the interim title.
* Said it doesn’t make sense for him to be eligible to fight and then have two guys fight for an interim title.
* Said he still has to see where he stands with the UFC on whether they strip his title or not.
* Said there were all kinds of problems with the drug testing, from chain of custody issues to specimen transportation issues. Sounds a lot like what was going on with Baroni’s case at the time.
* Said his research on Nandrolone shows that urinalysis is the worst way to test for the steroid.
* Feels that he is still 100% innocent.
__________________
Gygax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 03:15 PM   #7
Champion
 
RockemSockem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 2,913
Default

The situation unfortunately is very complicated and has been from the get-go. Honestly, i haven't been sure what to think the entire time. I get upset when someone feels they have it all figured out one way or the other. Imo the only facts of the matter are how unprofessionally the entire matter has been handled and that drug testing needs to be re-examined and reformed. I don't know whether Sherk is innocent or guilty, but i know that no innocent person should be put through what he's been.
__________________
"I will do nothing lightly. When I walk, I will walk heavily. When I fight, I will fight with conviction. When I speak, I will speak strongly. When I feel, I will feel everything. When I love, I will love with everything."

-Evan Tanner
RockemSockem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 03:16 PM   #8
Contender
 
mxfuel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ND
Posts: 403
Default

If he does wait to fight the winner of the BJ/Joe fight he might be out for a long time.
mxfuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 03:27 PM   #9
FF Moderator
 
Jras0001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 4,195
Default

Im sorry but that decision is total BS. If they, the CSAC, feel that Sherk did use banned substances, then they should have left the suspention as it was. If there was enough evidence to justify that the suspention be reduced, then it should have been completely overturned all together. Either there was or there wasnt evidence to show that he used banned substances. There isnt any middle of the road...either he did it or he didnt. This reduction in suspension crap just seems like a ploy of the CSAC to try to appease all parties concerned and keep the scrutiny off of them for not being prepared to hear the case on its scheduled date as well as other noted difficulties theyve had dealing with this entire issue.

I just think this is an easy cop out and its totally blows.
__________________


IT professional, at your service!
Jras0001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 03:32 PM   #10
Livin' the dream
 
CounterPuncher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pennsyltucky
Posts: 3,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jras0001 View Post
Im sorry but that decision is total BS. If they, the CSAC, feel that Sherk did use banned substances, then they should have left the suspention as it was. If there was enough evidence to justify that the suspention be reduced, then it should have been completely overturned all together. Either there was or there wasnt evidence to show that he used banned substances. There isnt any middle of the road...either he did it or he didnt. This reduction in suspension crap just seems like a ploy of the CSAC to try to appease all parties concerned and keep the scrutiny off of them for not being prepared to hear the case on its scheduled date as well as other noted difficulties theyve had dealing with this entire issue.

I just think this is an easy cop out and its totally blows.
I agree with this 100%.
__________________


Prediction Contest Wins:
UFN 11
UFC 79
UFC 81

[MTKrav911] 1:23 am "For some odd reason I'm watching "The Exorcist" and getting off on it"
[40daysZero40'sKrav911] - I'd like to see more Kickboxing, which HDNet has only now begun to show reruns of the big K-1 stuff and I'm getting off on that big time.
CounterPuncher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 03:49 PM   #11
Mayhem Monkey
 
HaVoK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,236
Send a message via AIM to HaVoK Send a message via MSN to HaVoK
Default

It would be great if somehow they worked out Penn vs. Sherk for the PPV, and Stevenson against maybe Kenny Florian for the next title shot.
__________________
"I got too hyped up and punted Jacare Wanderlei style and put a vagina on his head." - Jason "Mayhem" Miller

HaVoK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 03:59 PM   #12
Dana White Can Suck It
 
GeorgeXVX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: lakewood nj
Posts: 2,527
Send a message via AIM to GeorgeXVX
Default

I wonder if BJ Penn will fight him now?
__________________
Leading the charge of the Ground Fighting WarWagon:
Demian Maia, Ronaldo "Jacare" Souza, Fabricio "Vai Cavalo" Werdum, Marcelo Garcia, Marcus Aurelio, Ricardo Almeida, Roger Gracie, Vitor "Shaolin" Ribeiro, Ricardo Arona and Shinya "Tobikan Judan" Aoki

ELITE GROUND FIGHTING TAKING OVER THE WORLD!



FEDOR's BIGGEST FAN


Brock fans need a reality check
GeorgeXVX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 04:05 PM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indy home of THE 500
Posts: 297
Send a message via Yahoo to DoQ1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gygax View Post
This is courtesy of Sherdog's Josh Gross...


I'm sure this will leave no one happy. Sherk will be upset that he will be viewed as a cheater, and the anti-Sherk crowd will wonder why he gets his reduced while Hermes Franca's was kept at the full year suspension even though he fully admitted doing steroids.
Agree 100% hopefully he will stop cheating now. Then we can see some great fights in that stacked division.
DoQ1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 04:19 PM   #14
Champion
 
Saskabush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 2,190
Default

Strange stuff for sure. It seems that by reducing his sentence they are admitting that they have flaws in their testing system. Like Jras said, they should have just overturned his conviction because they aren't proving anything here other than they don't know wtf to do. They have to set precedence somewhere here, either uphold the original decision or overturn it completely, all they are doing is further tarnishing their reputation.
__________________
Saskabush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 04:32 PM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indy home of THE 500
Posts: 297
Send a message via Yahoo to DoQ1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jras0001 View Post
Im sorry but that decision is total BS. If they, the CSAC, feel that Sherk did use banned substances, then they should have left the suspention as it was. If there was enough evidence to justify that the suspention be reduced, then it should have been completely overturned all together. Either there was or there wasnt evidence to show that he used banned substances. There isnt any middle of the road...either he did it or he didnt. This reduction in suspension crap just seems like a ploy of the CSAC to try to appease all parties concerned and keep the scrutiny off of them for not being prepared to hear the case on its scheduled date as well as other noted difficulties theyve had dealing with this entire issue.

I just think this is an easy cop out and its totally blows.
Not really. Haven't you ever heard that "Ignorance is no excuse"??
If you get caught for any crime ignorance does not get you off. Let just say he never knew about the roids, he still had them in his system. The CSAC obviously showing they will work with athletes lessend the punishment for not knowing but can't let guys get away with juicing. It is pretty simple to me. Sean probably did not intentionally roid up, however the synthetic testosteron still was in his body and doing what it does. Helping the body recover and increasing strength and conditioning. He did it unknowingly and they heard his defense and adjusted the punishment accordingly. They don't worry about how it effects the title shot picture they just uphold the rules.

I give them props for being fair when they learned of the circumstances. Sherk will simply have to take more care in what he consumes.

That said I wish he could fight sooner maybe he will get a fight in the mean time who knows.
DoQ1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 04:41 PM   #16
Females are Fun
 
theEmpiric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orange County, Cali
Posts: 1,683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jras0001 View Post
Im sorry but that decision is total BS. If they, the CSAC, feel that Sherk did use banned substances, then they should have left the suspention as it was. If there was enough evidence to justify that the suspention be reduced, then it should have been completely overturned all together. Either there was or there wasnt evidence to show that he used banned substances. There isnt any middle of the road...either he did it or he didnt. This reduction in suspension crap just seems like a ploy of the CSAC to try to appease all parties concerned and keep the scrutiny off of them for not being prepared to hear the case on its scheduled date as well as other noted difficulties theyve had dealing with this entire issue.

I just think this is an easy cop out and its totally blows.
Well said, very well said! I concur!
__________________
Hi friendz!
theEmpiric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 06:00 PM   #17
MMA Referee, Promoter
 
lwbfl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 2,162
Send a message via Yahoo to lwbfl
Default

Steroid testing is not an exact science, especially urine testing. Mouth swab test are the least viable option, followed by urine then blood. Saliva and urine test for signs of steroids, blood test for the steroid itself. Then there are test for elevated testosterone to estrogen levels. The normal range is so varies from person to person, so it is not proof positive either.This is just a generalization of course, as it gets complicated when you factor in all the types of drugs available. They probably reduced the suspension because they know they can't say 100% that he did or did not use steroids. I have no doubt that he did, and had full knowledge what he was doing.
__________________
lwbfl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 06:27 PM   #18
FF Moderator
 
Jras0001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 4,195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoQ1 View Post
Not really. Haven't you ever heard that "Ignorance is no excuse"??
If you get caught for any crime ignorance does not get you off. Let just say he never knew about the roids, he still had them in his system. The CSAC obviously showing they will work with athletes lessend the punishment for not knowing but can't let guys get away with juicing. It is pretty simple to me. Sean probably did not intentionally roid up, however the synthetic testosteron still was in his body and doing what it does. Helping the body recover and increasing strength and conditioning. He did it unknowingly and they heard his defense and adjusted the punishment accordingly. They don't worry about how it effects the title shot picture they just uphold the rules.

I give them props for being fair when they learned of the circumstances. Sherk will simply have to take more care in what he consumes.

That said I wish he could fight sooner maybe he will get a fight in the mean time who knows.

Im sorry but I disagree. I never said he was ignorant of the fact and I never even posed that as being remotely close to a defense. I simply stated its an "either he did or he didnt" case. Nothing more and nothing less. He did them (knowingly or not) or he didnt take them. There was no reason for the suspention to be lessened or otherwise tampered with unless it was to completely overturn it. I still think they are trying to appease as many people as they can and get this issue off their hands. If there was enough evidence to indicate the suspension deserved to be lessened, then that would suggest there was enough doubt to his guilt and therefore warranted the suspension to be overturned. If there was enough evidence showing his guilt, then the 1 year suspension should have stood intact.
__________________


IT professional, at your service!
Jras0001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:25 PM   #19
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tremoton Utah
Posts: 3,524
Send a message via MSN to The-Iceman-Chuck-Liddell
Default

Ya it seems they weren't 100% sure he was guilty, so they reduced the sentence, which is BS to me. I still believe Sherk is innocent, and will be ready to kick some ass in his next fight.
The-Iceman-Chuck-Liddell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:52 PM   #20
Top Ranked
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 951
Default

Good to hear that he could be back as early as January. I'm guessing that means he won't have to be stripped of the title afterall. Instead of crowning an interim LW champion, the Penn/Stevenson fight at 79 will now probably be to determine who gets the title shot against Sherk.
Jenkins83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sherk's Hearing Postponed... AGAIN! Heatwaves UFC 7 11-10-2007 02:15 AM
Xyience Supplement That Sherk Takes Tests Positive The-Iceman-Chuck-Liddell UFC 16 11-05-2007 10:37 PM
Baroni suspension reduced to six months amartinez141 MMA 1 11-01-2007 03:58 PM
Undisclosed failed drug tests over the past year in California Gooner UFC 17 04-04-2007 11:36 AM
UFC 64 Results (Spoilers) guile UFC 15 10-15-2006 01:59 AM


UFC Official Site
EliteXC Official Site
King of the Cage
Play Free Games
Live Arcade
News Chat Forum



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.