Quote:
Originally Posted by WanderleiSliver
Why wouldn't they favour the guy who has beat top 5 competition in his division, Machida and Silva should in my opinion have to beat someone like Chuck or Wanderlei, before they can get in line first.
With that said I wouldn't be angry if Machida got a shot, but Silva isn't there yet.
|
You're talking about Chuck here right? Well if we go by the FF rankings Chuck has only beat one top 5 LHW (Wandy). Rashad isn't top 5 and if Chuck wins the fight against Rashad he'll still be 2-2 in his last 4 fights (one of his losts coming against a less than stellar fighter). So while Chuch has fought some tough opponents he hasn't fought them well recently.
If Machida wins againt Silva he's 6-0 in the UFC, I think that makes him more worthy than Chuck. I agree him not fighting a top 5 LHW is a problem, but it's also hard for him when he's never matched against one.
If Silva beats Machida he has beaten a top 5 LHW and he's 5-0 in the UFC. I definately think that can compare with Chuck recently mediocre record.
But when it all comes down I think Dana wants Chuck to fight for the title. The right thing to do would have been to match Machida against Chuck to find out who the #1 contender really is, but I think Dana didn't like the risk of Chuck getting his ass handed to him so he played it safe. Edit: I'm not saying Chuck will dominate Rashad though, I think Rashad is an underdog but has a decent chance.