This thread has had no replies for more than 90 days, and is now closed to further replies.
sean sherk vs. evan dunham!! wtf?!
|
Drooling4Carcass
|
Posted 1:03 pm, 09/26/2010
|
another thing is that although sherk got those td the sub attempts have to count for something. The cut won sherk the first round, but the other rounds have to go Evan. Sherk didnt show the same gnp in the last rounds, was loseing on the feet and had to fend of sub attempts...tds cant negate all that.
|
|
Normo
|
Posted 12:15 pm, 09/26/2010
|
I dont know about anyone else but I also called it for Sherk, I scored all the fights on tonights with the judges. Sherk easily won round 1 and the other 2 rounds were close, so 1 of them could of easily gone to Sherk.
|
|
Seikan
|
Posted 11:38 am, 09/26/2010
|
|
|
|
Seikan
|
Posted 11:37 am, 09/26/2010
|
|
|
|
FightFan76
|
Posted 11:30 am, 09/26/2010
|
Sonic Death Monkey | You should be posting in the results section, but yeah, in my opinion this is a prime example of wrestling scoring too much. Sherk won the first round, Dunham clearly won the last two. |
Agreed, I dont have a problem w/ fighters using wrestling to gain an advantage, but the scoring for it blows.....
|
|
Seikan
|
Posted 2:53 am, 09/26/2010
|
|
|
|
vanners
|
Posted 10:58 pm, 09/25/2010
|
|
|
|
Sonic Death Monkey
|
Posted 10:15 pm, 09/25/2010
|
You should be posting in the results section, but yeah, in my opinion this is a prime example of wrestling scoring too much. Sherk won the first round, Dunham clearly won the last two.
|
|
vanners
|
Posted 9:30 pm, 09/25/2010
|
|
|
|
|
