Quote:
|
Originally Posted by subgenius
These darn non-title fights make me mad. I keep forgetting this fight is non-title. Why have two non-title fights in a row? Any time Hughes fights it ought to be for that title he owns...
|
well, the first of these two non title fights was only due to riggs not beign able to make weight, or it would have been for the belt. this fight with gracie is more of an exhibition fight than anything else. its a non title fight that has no bearing on matts ranking, the title, or who he fights aftward wheather he wins or loses.
i do agree with you though, once someone is a champion, their fights should be for the belt, unless the oponent cant make weight.