 |  |
04-10-2007, 07:58 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 747
Points: 2,502
Bank: 0
Total Points: 2,502
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamfield
Serra should be ranked above GSP. He beat him, after all. Experience and record have nothing to do with how people are ranked. You're only as good as your last fight.
|
Ahhh so if Serra should be ranked ABOVE GSP, and Serra is not supposed to be ranked #1 here...
...then that would push GSP even LOWER down on the ranking list! I don't believe the majority of GSP worshipers would like that very much. Best to just let Matt Serra have his rightful #1 ranking.
|
|
|
04-10-2007, 09:07 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Mayhem Monkey
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,144
Points: 60
Bank: 817,037
Total Points: 817,097
Donate
|
Sorry if someone has already posted this....but who is gonna get the next title shot for WW? At 69 they said pretty much the winner of Kos/Diego gets the title shot or is it gonna be Hughes? Personally I don't think either of them should have a shot right after that fight.
__________________
"Georges is a likeable guy. He's definitely a very good poster boy. If you look at him, he's got the looks. Whatever man. I don't know. The abs. What are people looking at? They like him. He's like a real life Van Damme. And then they got me in there, who's the real life Joe Pesci or something." - Matt Serra.
|
|
|
04-10-2007, 09:21 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
twigz owns me
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Findlay, Ohio
Posts: 3,279
Points: 107
Bank: 0
Total Points: 107
Donate
|
I think calling Matt Serra the number 1 ww in the world is a little premature. If he beats GSP again, and Matt Hughes then by all means...make him #1 but until then...it's premature.
__________________
|
|
|
04-10-2007, 09:22 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
Champion
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,468
Points: 3,556
Bank: 1
Total Points: 3,557
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIPPEN
Its obvious the ranking system is a joke when a fighter goes from not even being in the top 10 to #1 in a single fight..
|
Great point. I also think that RockemSockem has made some exceptional points with this argument.
For a ratings system, I have no problem if you want to rank all of the champions #1, but you can't pick and choose which champions vault to #1 and which ones stay behind the champion. RockemSockem provided a great example with Diaz/Gomi. How can Serra vault to #1 after beating GSP, yet Diaz is still behind Gomi after beating him? They're just no logic to the system and imo MMA Weekly's rating system continues to lose credibility.
6-4 in the UFC with a great victory over GSP makes Serra the champion, it does not make him the #1 ranked WW in the world.
For those of you who do believe that Serra should be ranked #1... do you believe that he could fight Hughes, Diego, Koscheck, Parisyan, and Fitch without losing? He's already lost to Parisyan and BJ Penn, not to mention Din Thomas and Shonie Carter.
I really don't want to take away from Serra's amazing victory as he completely deserves it, but he's not the #1 WW in the world. My view will change only if he beats Hughes and wins the GSP rematch.
__________________
|
|
|
04-10-2007, 09:22 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 747
Points: 2,502
Bank: 0
Total Points: 2,502
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmashingMachine
I think calling Matt Serra the number 1 ww in the world is a little premature. If he beats GSP again, and Matt Hughes then by all means...make him #1 but until then...it's premature.
|
If he is not #1, who would you say is #1 then?
|
|
|
04-10-2007, 09:23 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
Champion
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,468
Points: 3,556
Bank: 1
Total Points: 3,557
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaVoK
Sorry if someone has already posted this....but who is gonna get the next title shot for WW? At 69 they said pretty much the winner of Kos/Diego gets the title shot or is it gonna be Hughes? Personally I don't think either of them should have a shot right after that fight.
|
In the post-fight press conference, Dana allegedly said that it's going to be Hughes.
__________________
|
|
|
04-10-2007, 09:30 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Champion
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,468
Points: 3,556
Bank: 1
Total Points: 3,557
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super Warrior
If he is not #1, who would you say is #1 then?
|
That actually is a great question. No matter what anyone's top 5 is, it is completely flawed.
My current top 5 would be:
1. Matt Hughes
Even though he makes me cringe personally, he previously defended his title 9 or 10 times and only lost to a super-talented GSP.
2. GSP
Serra beat him, no bones about it. But I believe GSP would win 2/3 or 8/10 for that matter.
3. Diego Sanchez
Diego/Kos are 1-1. Diego's victory simply impressed me more than Kos's did.
4. Karo Parisyan
Parisyan beat Serra before and I believe he'd do it again.
5. Josh Koscheck
I honestly don't know where I'd truly place Koscheck until I see him face more top talent. He's a wildcard in my book similar to Evans and Jardine.
6. Matt Serra
Phenomenal victory, but it will take more than one win to sway me on him. I view him similarly to Jason McDonald who had two strong victories, but succumbed to top talent. Time will tell if Serra can repeat the trend.
__________________
|
|
|
04-10-2007, 09:33 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 747
Points: 2,502
Bank: 0
Total Points: 2,502
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heatwaves
My current top 5 would be:
1. Matt Hughes
|
Matt Hughes #1 WW?! Ha!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heatwaves
6. Matt Serra
Phenomenal victory, but it will take more than one win to sway me on him. I view him similarly to Jason McDonald who had two strong victories, but succumbed to top talent. Time will tell if Serra can repeat the trend.
|
So GSP was not top talent then?
|
|
|
04-10-2007, 09:43 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
twigz owns me
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Findlay, Ohio
Posts: 3,279
Points: 107
Bank: 0
Total Points: 107
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super Warrior
If he is not #1, who would you say is #1 then?
|
Well, that's a good point and one that is hard to argue. All I am saying is that I think if you line them up 10 times in row GSP would win the other 9. I am not totally convinced off of one fight that he is the best in the world. It'd be like calling Buster Douglas the best HW in the world after he beat Tyson...with guys like Evander Holyfield, Lennox Lewis, Riddick Bowe, Ray Mercer, Razor Ruddock, etc all fighting at that time. It was a freak. Tyson would've hammered Douglas the next 9 times too...more than likely. And, Holyfield did a few months later by knocking Douglas out in the third round. I need to see Matt Serra be more road tested before I buy into all of that. Personally, I think this win over GSP was a freak too. I am not saying it was lucky, but one of those incidents where anything can happen in a mma fight. All of that said, to answer your question, I think GSP is still the best all around WW in the world right now.
__________________
|
|
|
04-10-2007, 09:46 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 747
Points: 2,502
Bank: 0
Total Points: 2,502
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmashingMachine
All of that said, to answer your question, I think GSP is still the best all around WW in the world right now.
|
Wait...which was one GSP again? Are you referring to that guy who got beat up and lost his belt recently?
|
|
|
04-10-2007, 09:48 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
|
Champion
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,468
Points: 3,556
Bank: 1
Total Points: 3,557
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super Warrior
Matt Hughes #1 WW?! Ha!
|
It's so easy to dismiss a great fighter when he loses the belt. Love him or hate him, I don't believe anyone has defended his title more times or held a belt longer. Do you feel that Serra would beat Hughes? And if so, would you be willing to wager all of your FF points with me when the fight happens?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super Warrior
So GSP was not top talent then?
|
It's funny... as I was writing that I figured it would be misinterpreted. GSP is top talent and was the strong victory that I was referring to. For Serra to gain my #1 ranking, he has to beat more top talent. This was along the lines of my analogy of McDonald, he had strong victories to earn him more respect and a higher ranking, but he didn't maintain it to solidify himself as a top contender. If Serra loses his next fight, no one will be on his bandwagon any longer.
__________________
|
|
|
04-11-2007, 10:50 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
|
twigz owns me
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Findlay, Ohio
Posts: 3,279
Points: 107
Bank: 0
Total Points: 107
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super Warrior
Wait...which was one GSP again? Are you referring to that guy who got beat up and lost his belt recently?
|
Well, all I have to say is we'll see how long you stay on Serra's bandwagon when GSP reclaims the crown. Actually, I should say "we'll see how long you stay on Serra's bandwagon after Matt Hughes beats him in his first title defense." Serra could be for real. Personally, I don't think so, but to say he's the Number 1 WW in the world off of one fight is a little far fetched for me.
__________________
|
|
|
04-11-2007, 10:58 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
Top Prospect
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 64
Points: 448
Bank: 0
Total Points: 448
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super Warrior
Ahhh so if Serra should be ranked ABOVE GSP, and Serra is not supposed to be ranked #1 here...
...then that would push GSP even LOWER down on the ranking list! I don't believe the majority of GSP worshipers would like that very much. Best to just let Matt Serra have his rightful #1 ranking.
|
That was my point.. GSP is #2 and Serra is #1, and that's the way it should be. I never said Serra should not be ranked #1.
|
|
|
04-12-2007, 12:06 AM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
|
Top Prospect
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 63
Points: 3,754
Bank: 0
Total Points: 3,754
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heatwaves
Great point. I also think that RockemSockem has made some exceptional points with this argument.
For a ratings system, I have no problem if you want to rank all of the champions #1, but you can't pick and choose which champions vault to #1 and which ones stay behind the champion. RockemSockem provided a great example with Diaz/Gomi. How can Serra vault to #1 after beating GSP, yet Diaz is still behind Gomi after beating him? They're just no logic to the system and imo MMA Weekly's rating system continues to lose credibility.
6-4 in the UFC with a great victory over GSP makes Serra the champion, it does not make him the #1 ranked WW in the world.
For those of you who do believe that Serra should be ranked #1... do you believe that he could fight Hughes, Diego, Koscheck, Parisyan, and Fitch without losing? He's already lost to Parisyan and BJ Penn, not to mention Din Thomas and Shonie Carter.
I really don't want to take away from Serra's amazing victory as he completely deserves it, but he's not the #1 WW in the world. My view will change only if he beats Hughes and wins the GSP rematch.
|
How can someone be the champ and someone else be ranked higher? If you're the champ, that means you beat the best, and now you're the best, until someone beats you. I guess I just don't get the logic of a champion being outranked by a challenger. IMO, the champ should always be #1 for as long as he holds the title.
|
|
|
04-12-2007, 12:37 AM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
|
aka Okiipapasan
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: It's not where you live, but how.
Posts: 3,177
Points: 22
Bank: 393,676
Total Points: 393,698
Donate
|
With two major organizations not every champ is going to be #1. I am happy for Serra but think this ranking is way off. I think anybody in the top 5 under him would be heavy favorites to win.
But the worst thing of all out of all this is that the UFC WW champion of the world was a game show contestant that had to work his way through b level fighters on his way to the crown. The only official win was over Lytle, and that is not a fighter that should put anybody in contention for a title.
Damn you Matt Serra for adding credibilty to TUF4!!!
__________________
 
^^My bro's new site/online store for hats and tees. Feedback welcome.^^
Go here for a selection of avatars and signatures donated by your fellow members. If you would like to make a contribution to the album, shoot me a PM. If you would like a custom made one, go here for avatars and here for signatures
|
|
|
04-12-2007, 01:25 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
|
Champion
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,468
Points: 3,556
Bank: 1
Total Points: 3,557
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gekko07
How can someone be the champ and someone else be ranked higher? If you're the champ, that means you beat the best, and now you're the best, until someone beats you. I guess I just don't get the logic of a champion being outranked by a challenger. IMO, the champ should always be #1 for as long as he holds the title.
|
Very easily. By ranking a fighter #1 (regardless whether he's the champion or not) it suggests they are the best fighter in the world. I don't think Serra is the best fighter in the world, just because he fought one outstanding fight.
Think about it this way, should the Oakland Raiders, the worst team in the NFL last year, be ranked #1 if they upset Indianapolis in a single game? Although would be an impressive victory, they would have to build a reputation as a winner against other top teams to gain that ranking. Matt Serra is 6-4 in the UFC, that's not the record of the #1 WW in the world.
My gripes aren't just about MMA Weekly's ranking of Serra #1, it is about "selective logic". They're not consistent with the reasoning you're supporting. As I stated before, Nick Diaz took out PRIDE's LW champion Gomi, yet Gomi is ranked about Diaz. They can't have it both ways.
__________________
|
|
|
04-12-2007, 01:40 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
|
Champion
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,286
Points: 10,431
Bank: 373,254
Total Points: 383,684
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heatwaves
MMA Weekly published new rankings today, which reminded me why we started our own ranking system here at FF. With one victory, Matt Serra managed to leapfrog all ten spots to claim #1. While a superb victory and arguably the biggest upset of all time, it doesn't suddenly make Serra the best WW in the world.
You could argue that they are merely giving the champion his due... but why then is LW Champion Sean Sherk not even listed within the LW top 10 or why is HW Randy Couture a mere 5th?
I also take issue with Koscheck being listed 4th. Just because Koscheck now has a 1-1 record against Sanchez in an unspirited, lackluster fight, he's suddenly better than BJ Penn, Parysian and Fitch?
I can't wait until we vote again in a couple of weeks.
For the full results, here's the link: MMA WEEKLY - Your #1 Source for Daily MMA News, Interviews, Multimedia, and More
|
Well the UFC has a 170 weightclass and PRIDE doesn't or at least it didn't so who ever holds the UFC title at WW is #1.
PRIDEs classes were like LW, MW, LHW, HW they don't have a div = to the UFCs WW class.
__________________
"Don't think of your self as an ugly person, Think of your self as a beautiful monkey"
"I just want to choke her till she doesn't breath anymore......Why wont you die !!!" - Gina Carano[/i]
|
|
|
04-12-2007, 02:13 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
|
Champion
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 2,592
Points: 258
Bank: 226,338
Total Points: 226,596
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RebLMunkE
Well the UFC has a 170 weightclass and PRIDE doesn't or at least it didn't so who ever holds the UFC title at WW is #1.
PRIDEs classes were like LW, MW, LHW, HW they don't have a div = to the UFCs WW class.
|
That doesn't mean UFC is the only place with a WW class. There are ranked fighters outside of UFC and Pride. There are top10 WW fighters not in the UFC. And even so it doesn't change the fact that rankings are not based upon a single performance. They take into account everything the fighter has done for the past few years, possibly their entire career.
GSP still deserves at least the #2 spot, under Hughes if anyone. He has wins over the #3,5,7 WWs. Also Sean Sherk, who would be on this list if he did not move to LW. Also Frank Trigg, the #10 MW, who would also be on that list if he still fought at WW. Plus a handful of wins over other notable MMA names.
Although all his losses were by a very close margin, and that should play a factor, Serra's biggest win before GSP was either Yves Edwards in 2001 or Ivan Menjivar in 2004(who GSP also beat). Both good fighters, but neither are ranked. Edwards is a LW and Menjivar is a FW.
A single win over GSP cannot boost him to the status of #1 because he has not fought enough top competition and has had trouble finishing the unranked opponents he's fought. While GSP has finished many of his ranked opponents.
|
|
|
04-12-2007, 03:32 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
|
FF Handicapper
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,303
Points: 49
Bank: 7,862
Total Points: 7,911
Donate
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RockemSockem
That doesn't mean UFC is the only place with a WW class. There are ranked fighters outside of UFC and Pride. There are top10 WW fighters not in the UFC. And even so it doesn't change the fact that rankings are not based upon a single performance. They take into account everything the fighter has done for the past few years, possibly their entire career.
GSP still deserves at least the #2 spot, under Hughes if anyone. He has wins over the #3,5,7 WWs. Also Sean Sherk, who would be on this list if he did not move to LW. Also Frank Trigg, the #10 MW, who would also be on that list if he still fought at WW. Plus a handful of wins over other notable MMA names.
Although all his losses were by a very close margin, and that should play a factor, Serra's biggest win before GSP was either Yves Edwards in 2001 or Ivan Menjivar in 2004(who GSP also beat). Both good fighters, but neither are ranked. Edwards is a LW and Menjivar is a FW.
A single win over GSP cannot boost him to the status of #1 because he has not fought enough top competition and has had trouble finishing the unranked opponents he's fought. While GSP has finished many of his ranked opponents.
|
While I think that career should be considered a little bit, rankings are basically who is the best at this moment. While other orgs have WW divisions, you would have to agree that the UFC is the top level of competition in the world for WW. Think of it like this, if you asked every WW in the UFC who would they want to fight, almost all of them would want Serra the WW champ. GSP, Hughes, Kos, and Sanchez would all help someones legitimacy in establishing themselves, but Serra is the one to beat. If someone beats Hughes or GSP, they would say they deserve a shot at the title.
I agree that the WW ranking is a unique situation. Once you add in Pride's LW, MW, LHW, and HW, the ranking systems get kinda clouded. Consider the rankings in boxing (which are usually a mess), but the champ is always on top and the next person is the #1 contender.
__________________
|
|
|
04-12-2007, 03:47 PM
|
#40 ( | | | |